Aside from the improved power efficiency and performance uplift, the new AVX-512 computational capabilities and intergraded RDNA2 graphics capable of AV1 decode, H.264/H.265 decode+encode are also some of the noteworthy features AMD has brought with its new Zen 4 CPUs. As of today, the wait is finally over and we can finally share with you the results of the performance benchmarks of the Ryzen 9 7950X which we have been doing for the past 2 weeks.

The Ryzen 9 7950X is the best consumer CPU that AMD has to offer this time but is it worth your money? Let’s take a look at the benchmark results and see for yourself.






AMD Ryzen 9 7950X16C/32T170WUp to 5.7 / 4.580MB$699
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X12C/24T170WUp to 5.6 / 4.776MB$549
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X8C/16T105WUp to 5.4 / 4.540MB$399
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X6C/12T105WUp to 5.3 / 4.738MB$299


Unlike any previous Ryzen 9 CPUs we’ve tested in the past, the Ryzen 9 7950X doesn’t come with a box cooler. Despite the size of the box, the only thing you’ll get inside the box is the CPU itself and that’s it. The new Ryzen 7000 series desktop processors now come with an LGA design and are noticeably smaller compared to their predecessors.

AMD has finally moved on to LGA design for the consumer CPUs, which means you no longer have to worry about the CPU sticking at the bottom of the cooler like how it is with the previous Ryzen CPUs. Although the ILM design is similar to what we’ve seen on the Intel LGA1700 socket, the socket design is different and you won’t be able to stuff an Intel CPU on it.

Test System Setup

For our test this time, we’re using the Ryzen 9 7950X and you can refer to the rest of the components used in the following lists:

Test System 1

CPUIntel Core i9-12900K
MotherboardASUS ROG Maximus Z690 APEX
MemoryKingston Fury Beast DDR5 RGB (DDR5-6000 CL30)
Graphics CardRadeon RX 6700 XT
Power SupplyCooler Master V1200 Platinum
Primary StorageKingston KC3000 2TB
Secondary StorageWD Black 6TB
CPU CoolerCooler Master MasterLiquid ML360R
ChassisStreacom Open BenchTable
Operating SystemWindows 11 64bit

Test System 2

CPUAMD Ryzen 9 5950X
MotherboardGigabyte X570S AORUS MASTER
MemoryTeamGroup Dark Z FPS DDR4-4000 CL16
Graphics CardRadeon RX 6700 XT
Power SupplyCooler Master V1200 Platinum
Primary StorageKingston KC3000 2TB
Secondary StorageWD Black 6TB
CPU CoolerCooler Master MasterLiquid ML360R
ChassisStreacom Open BenchTable
Operating SystemWindows 11 64bit

Test System 3

CPURyzen 9 7950X
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi / ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Gene / Gigabyte X670E AORUS Master
MemoryG.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR5-6000 CL30
Graphics CardRadeon RX 6700 XT
Power SupplyCooler Master V1200 Platinum
Primary StorageKingston KC3000 2TB
Secondary StorageWD Black 6TB
CPU CoolerCooler Master MasterLiquid ML360R
ChassisStreacom Open BenchTable
Operating SystemWindows 11 64bit

Memory Settings

As we’re still in the process of exploring DDR5 memory overclocking on Zen 4, DDR5-6400 CL32 is the highest we’re able to get at the moment and it’s done on the ROG Crosshair X670E Gene. But the main tests are still done on the ASRock X670E Taichi with the G.Skill Trident Z Neo configured at DDR5-6000 CL30 and slightly tightened memory timings. With that, we’re able to achieve a slightly lower latency at 60ns as compared to 65ns from enabling the EXPO profile.

During our memory tests, we notice that the adjustments on the memory settings are significantly easier on 2 DIMM boards like the ROG Crosshair X670E Gene and the memory training time is also slightly faster. Adjustments on the sub-timings can vary by motherboards as well but as far as what we’ve tested, the Gene is probably my personal favorite so far.

The same timings can be achieved with other AMD EXPO certified kits like this Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5-6000 CL36 kit. We’ve also tested the system with an existing JEDEC DDR5 kit and it works, but optimizing it will take a bit more effort compared to an AMD EXPO certified memory kit.

We have also tried booting up the system with all four DIMM slots fully populated and it’s just as what AMD said, it will end up with DDR5-3600 instead of DDR-4800. It’s pretty much the thing you’ll see in most of those TikTok PC build videos which I don’t personally recommend unless you’re not aiming for the high-frequency game. We did, however, manage to get your test system to boot at DDR5-5600 using the EXPO profile but that’s the highest we can go.

Games benchmarks – 1080P

The Division 2 1080P High Settings Cyberpunk 2077 1080P High Settings Dirt 5 1080P High Settings Far Cry 6 1080P High Settings Horizon Zero Dawn 1080P High Settings Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080P High Settings

Games benchmarks – 1440P

The Division 2 1440P High Settings Cyberpunk 2077 1440P High Settings Dirt 5 1440P High Settings Far Cry 6 1440P High Settings Horizon Zero Dawn 1440P High Settings Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440P High Settings

Games benchmarks – 4K

The Division 2 4K High Settings Cyberpunk 2077 4K High Settings Dirt 5 4K High Settings Far Cry 6 4K High Settings Horizon Zero Dawn 4K High Settings Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4K High Settings

Starting off with gaming performance, for games that are more CPU-bound like Far Cry 6, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and The Division 2, the performance gain on 1080p resolution is the most noticeable of course. As higher resolutions of 1440P and 4K are more GPU bound, the performance impact with CPU is no longer that significant and you’re mostly limited by the GPU itself.

We can see a performance uplift of up to 24% against the R9 5950X, and up to 6% against the already very powerful i9-12900K, and I think that’s a really impressive feat that AMD has managed to pull off this time. Even for games that are more GPU bound, we can still see a reasonable gain between 8~15%. If you have a much more powerful GPU on hand, you’re going to see even better performance numbers than what we have here.

With our slightly tweaked memory settings, some games will benefit from it and some don’t really show too many differences. For games that do, the improvement can be seen on the 1% low. This basically means smoother gameplay and consistent frame times.

Synthetic benchmark

SuperPi 32M Benchmark

Wprime 1024M Benchmark 3DMark Firestrike Time Spy 7zip Compression Decompression Cinebench R23 Multi Core Cinebench R23 Single Core Corona Renderer 1.3 Benchmark Geekbench 3 Benchmark Multi Core Geekbench 3 Benchmark Single Core UL Procyon Professional Benchmark Suite V Ray 5 Benchmark

Moving on to the productivity tests, this is pretty much what AMD always boasts on with the crazy high cores and threads count on their Ryzen CPUs. From the results, including the benchmarks that focus on content creation tasks such as photo edition, video editing, and rendering works, the 7950X as it easily tops the chart in our benchmark when compared against both the 5950X and 12900K.

Power, thermals

Now for the power draw and thermals – is it hot? is it drawing a lot of power? Yes, of course. if you’re going to fully utilize all the cores and threads at all. The 7950X has a rated TDP of 170W and a max socket power of 230W. Unlike the Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X, this CPU is meant for those who will really need all the cores it has.

I’d recommend using an AIO cooler with a 360mm radiator for this one but if you don’t have any of those fancy coolers, you can always make use of the AMD Eco Mode which let the 7950x operate at 65W TDP. Even with that limitation, the chip is still capable of performing on par or if not, better than a 5950x at uncapped TDP. While I don’t know in what circumstance you will want to do that, you can’t deny that is some crazy power efficiency right there. And if you do have a reasonably powerful AIO cooler for the 7950x, you can even explore the PBO settings in the BIOS for the best performance out of it.

In our test, the highest load we’ve observed so far is at 218W with the highest load temperature hitting 95°C but only with Realbench just for fun, and we’re using an older model of the Cooler Master ML360R AIO. While the 45°C for idle temperature we’re seeing during our tests may be high, in most use cases, the 7950x barely even go above 90°C during benchmarks with productivity works. During our game benchmarks session, the CPU load temperature is even lower, mostly hovering around the 70°C range.


So that’s everything we have for you as of now with the Ryzen 9 7950X but here’s the age-old question – is it really worth your money? Well, I’d say that totally depends on what you are currently using right now.

Upgrading to Zen 4 is the same as upgrading to the Intel 12th gen because you will need a new motherboard for it. Since AMD is fully committed to DDR5, the cost might be higher since DDR5 RAMs are more expensive. However, AMD seems to have better optimization out of the box even though it’s their first time getting onto DDR5. I’d probably not recommend the upgrade for AMD Zen3 or Intel 11th gen users, as these are still pretty powerful today and will probably last for a while.

As for those who are coming from AMD Zen2, Intel 10th gen, or lower, yes, I would recommend the upgrade. The upgrade cost is going to be steep, $699 for the Ryzen 9 7950X alone, not counting in the motherboard and RAM. But hey, at least the performance difference is going to be a lot more significant and you’ll probably be using it for a very long while.

Where to buy? (Affiliate links)


Related Posts

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Tech-Critter and receive notifications of new posts by email.